CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12] — Page 495

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

fforts for intent on the outer a t

Ap 50

melis Blas I

491

children of any contributor who marries after his retirement on pension, are not entitled to any pension under the Ordinance. The first impression is that the provisions of S. 26 are at variance with and control the terms of the concluding paragraph of S.15: but upon consideration, I think that the right conclusion is that the operation of S. 26 must be subject to the definite exception and proviso contained in S. 15.

For the reason that the Ordinance does not provide for the case of restitution to former status; that it does not provide means of continuing the contributions, and that the applicant has elected not to avail himself of such means, I think that his request to be reinstated cannot be allowed.

Next as regards the point whether Mr. Ng Kwai Shang is bound on re-appointment to contribute to the fund. Section 4 designates three classes of officers who are liable to contribute.

In only two of these classes could Mr. Ng be included. Is he a public officer who enters the Civil Service of the Colony after 31st December, 1887? or is he a person holding one of the offices mentioned in the Schedule A of the Ordinance? He first entered the service in 1876, was pensioned in October '96 and rejoined in November 97 from which

Edit History

2026-05-30 06:10:05 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
fforts for intent on the outer a t Ap 50 melis Blas I 491 children of any contributor who marries after his retirement on pension, are not entitled to any pension under the Ordinance. The first impression is that the provisions of S. 26 are at variance with and control the terms of the concluding paragraph of S.15: but upon consideration, I think that the right conclusion is that the operation of S. 26 must be subject to the definite exception and proviso contained in S. 15. For the reason that the Ordinance does not provide for the case of restitution to former status; that it does not provide means of continuing the contributions, and that the applicant has elected not to avail himself of such means, I think that his request to be reinstated cannot be allowed. Next as regards the point whether Mr. Ng Kwai Shang is bound on re-appointment to contribute to the fund. Section 4 designates three classes of officers who are liable to contribute. In only two of these classes could Mr. Ng be included. Is he a public officer who enters the Civil Service of the Colony after 31st December, 1887? or is he a person holding one of the offices mentioned in the Schedule A of the Ordinance? He first entered the service in 1876, was pensioned in October '96 and rejoined in November 97 from which
Baseline (Original)
fforts for intent on the outer a t ป ہو Ap 50 melis Blas I 491 children of any contributor who marries after his retire- ment on pension, are not entitled to any pension under the Ordinance. The first impression is that the provisions of S. 26 are at variance with and control the terms of the con- clucing paragraph of S.15: but upon consideration,I think that the right conclusion is that the operation of S. 26 Must be subject to the aefinite exception and proviso con- tained in S. 15. For the reason that the Ordinance does not provide for the case of restitution to former status; that it coes He provide means of continuing the contributions, and that the applicant has elected not to avail himself of such means, I think that his request to be reinstated cannot be allowed. Next as regards the point whether Mr. Ng Kwai Shang is bound on re-appointment to contribute to the fund. Section 4 designates three classes of offi- cers who are liable to contribute. In only two of these classes could Mr. Ng be included. Is he a public officer who enters the Civil Ser- vice of the Colony after 31st. December,18307 or is he a per- son holding one of the offices mentioned in the Scheatle A of the Ordinance? He first entered the service in 1876, was pensioned in October '96 and rejoined in November 97 from which
2026-05-30 06:10:05 · Baseline
View content

fforts for intent on the outer a t

ป

ہو

Ap 50

melis Blas I

491

children of any contributor who marries after his retire-

ment on pension, are not entitled to any pension under the

Ordinance. The first impression is that the provisions of

S. 26 are at variance with and control the terms of the con-

clucing paragraph of S.15: but upon consideration,I think

that the right conclusion is that the operation of S. 26

Must be subject to the aefinite exception and proviso con-

tained in S. 15.

For the reason that the Ordinance does not

provide for the case of restitution to former status; that it

coes He provide means of continuing the contributions, and

that the applicant has elected not to avail himself of such

means, I think that his request to be reinstated cannot be

allowed.

Next as regards the point whether Mr. Ng Kwai

Shang is bound on re-appointment to contribute to the fund.

Section 4 designates three classes of offi-

cers who are liable to contribute.

In only two of these classes could Mr. Ng be

included. Is he a public officer who enters the Civil Ser-

vice of the Colony after 31st. December,18307 or is he a per-

son holding one of the offices mentioned in the Scheatle A

of the Ordinance? He first entered the service in 1876, was pensioned in October '96 and rejoined in November 97 from

which

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.